top of page

Path to U.S. Immigration: My EB-2 NIW Green Card Application Experience as a Biomedical Scientist

A scientist uses a microscope in a lab with DNA visuals; Statue of Liberty and U.S. Capitol in background. Chinese text on top.



Introduction


As a biomedical scientist who immigrated to the United States, I would like to share my personal experience applying for a U.S. green card (permanent residency) through the EB-2 National Interest Waiver (EB-2 NIW) category.


This article is not legal advice, but a first-hand account intended for fellow scientists, PhD students, postdocs, and researchers who are considering long-term career development in the U.S. and exploring employment-based immigration pathways.




My Background as an EB-2 NIW Applicant



I earned my bachelor’s degree in Taiwan before coming to the United States to pursue my Master’s and Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering at Cornell University.

After graduation, I continued my research career at Boston Children’s Hospital and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).


In early February 2019, I filed my I-140 immigrant petition under the EB-2 NIW (National Interest Waiver)category.

Because applicants born in Taiwan were current with no priority date backlog at that time, I was able to concurrently file my I-485 Adjustment of Status application shortly after receiving the I-140 receipt notice.


This combination—EB-2 NIW plus current priority dates—makes this pathway especially attractive for many Taiwanese and international researchers.




The Core of EB-2 NIW: A Persuasive Petition Narrative



For EB-2 NIW cases, the most critical element is not the forms themselves, but a strong and well-structured petition letter.


Your goal is to clearly demonstrate to the immigration officer that:


  1. You possess advanced expertise in your field

  2. Your past work has substantial merit

  3. Your future work will benefit the United States at a national level





Demonstrating Professional Expertise



In my petition, I submitted documentation including:


  • My Ph.D. diploma and academic transcripts from Cornell University

  • Employment and research verification letters from Boston Children’s Hospital and MIT



These materials established that I had received advanced scientific training and was actively contributing to research at leading U.S. institutions.




Connecting Research to U.S. National Interest



Holding a Ph.D. alone is not sufficient. USCIS officers want to understand why your work matters to the United States.


One example from my petition involved my research on cell-based therapies for Type 1 diabetes. In the petition, I explained:


  • The number of individuals diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes in the U.S. each year

  • The lack of curative treatments and the lifelong dependence on insulin therapy

  • How successful cell replacement therapies could potentially transform patient care, reduce healthcare burden, and improve quality of life



The key is not technical complexity, but societal impact—how your work advances public health, innovation, or national competitiveness.




Recommendation Letters: Independent vs. Related References



Recommendation letters play a crucial role in EB-2 NIW petitions, and understanding USCIS’s interpretation is essential.



Related References



USCIS defines “related” very broadly. This often includes:


  • Thesis advisors

  • Direct collaborators

  • Researchers from the same institution or organization (even large ones)



Such letters are still valuable but are generally considered less objective.




Independent References



Independent recommendation letters carry significant weight because the recommenders have no direct professional relationship with you.


Common ways to identify independent recommenders include:


  • Researchers who have cited your publications (via Google Scholar)

  • Well-known scholars you meet at international conferences

  • Experts working in the same field but at different institutions



📌 Practical advice:

Most EB-2 NIW petitions benefit from at least three independent recommendation letters, ideally from recognized experts in the field.

The optimal number and balance should always be discussed with your immigration attorney.




My Timeline: Two Years, Four Months, and a Mystery Approval


A girl reads a book in a sunlit field with daisies. She's wearing a blue dress, surrounded by trees. A sense of peace and focus prevails.

My green card process was far from fast.


From filing to final approval, the entire process took two years and four months, much of it during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Interestingly, I received two separate I-140 approval notices during this period. To understand why, I consulted:


  • My immigration attorney

  • The office of a Massachusetts U.S. Senator



Despite formal inquiries, no clear explanation was ever provided, and USCIS did not respond to the congressional inquiry.

To this day, this remains an unresolved mystery in my case.




Tracking Your Case: USCIS Tools That Actually Help



During the long waiting period, I found several official tools particularly useful.



USCIS Online Accounts (Register Both)





These systems do not always update simultaneously, so checking both can help ensure you see the latest status.




USCIS Processing Time Tool





Key points:


  • The first three letters of your receipt number indicate the processing center


    • TSC: Texas Service Center

    • MSC: National Benefits Center


  • Even if your case is transferred, processing time is usually tied to the original service center





What If Your Case Exceeds Normal Processing Time?



If your case exceeds USCIS’s published processing time:


  1. Submit an inquiry through USCIS (or via your attorney)

  2. Contact your local U.S. Representative or Senator’s office



📌 If USCIS fails to respond within one month, do not wait—congressional offices have the authority to follow up directly with federal agencies.




Final Thoughts: There Is No Formula—Only Preparation and Patience



From my experience, there is no reliable formula to predict EB-2 NIW processing times.


  • Some applicants receive approvals quickly

  • Others wait two or three times longer

  • Even within the same category, outcomes vary widely



The only things you can control are the strength of your petition and your patience during the process.


I hope this experience helps demystify the EB-2 NIW pathway for fellow scientists navigating U.S. immigration.




Disclaimer



I am not an immigration attorney. This article reflects my personal experience only.

For legal advice specific to your situation, please consult a qualified immigration lawyer.


If you found this article helpful, feel free to like, share, or leave a comment.

Comments


bottom of page