Leadership Series (Part 6):Cross-Cultural Communication: Why Global Leadership Begins with Cultural Understanding
- Jason Lu

- May 17
- 4 min read

Introduction: The Hardest Part Is Usually Not Language — It’s Culture
In the previous article, I discussed communication leadership, including:
emotional regulation
psychological safety
trust building
the curse of knowledge
However, once teams become more diverse, communication enters another level of complexity:
cross-cultural communication
Today, we live in an increasingly global environment.
Especially in biotech, technology, and startup industries, it is common to work with people from:
different countries
different cultures
different language backgrounds
Many collaboration problems may appear to be:
communication issues
management conflicts
personality differences
But in reality, the root cause is often:
different cultural assumptions.
Culture Is More Than Language and Food
When people think about culture, they often think of:
food
festivals
music
language
But the deeper parts of culture — the parts that most strongly affect communication — are usually things like:
how people perceive time
how authority is viewed
how trust is built
how emotions are expressed
how conflict is handled
how politeness is defined
In many ways, culture is a default framework for understanding the world.
And the difficult part is:
We are usually unaware of our own culture because it feels “normal” to us.
Culture Is Like an Onion
One metaphor I have always liked is:
Culture is like an onion.
Culture has many layers.
On the surface, we see:
food
clothing
language
music
holidays
But deeper layers include:
eye contact
personal space
hierarchy
teamwork vs. competition
emotional expression
directness
These are often the things that most strongly influence cross-cultural communication.
And many of them cannot truly be learned from books.
Most of the time, you only begin to understand a culture after actually living within it.
Most Cultural Conflicts Are Not About Right or Wrong
In multicultural environments, a common situation is that both sides believe they are being reasonable.
For example:
Americans may think Asian colleagues are not direct enough
Asians may think Americans are too aggressive
Germans may believe communication should be highly efficient
Japanese culture may place more emphasis on context and relationships
In many cases, these are not right-or-wrong problems.
They are differences in cultural expectations.
High-Context vs. Low-Context Communication
One of the most important concepts in cross-cultural communication is: High-context vs. Low-context communication
High-context communication
In high-context cultures, many things are not said explicitly.
People rely more heavily on:
tone
relationships
atmosphere
implied meaning
Examples often include:
Japan
China
Korea
many Middle Eastern cultures
In these cultures, being overly direct can sometimes be considered rude.
Low-context communication
In low-context cultures, people tend to prefer:
direct expression
explicit communication
clear and simple wording
Examples include:
the United States
Germany
the United Kingdom
Nordic countries
In these cultures:
“No” usually means “No.”
If communication becomes too indirect, the message may not be understood at all.
One of My Biggest Cultural Shocks After Moving to the U.S.
One of the biggest cultural adjustments I experienced after moving to the United States was how direct workplace communication could be.
For example:
disagreements are openly expressed
ideas are challenged directly during meetings
feedback is often immediate
At first, this felt uncomfortable.
Because in many Asian cultures, people often prefer to:
avoid direct conflict
maintain harmony
communicate more indirectly
But over time, I realized that neither style is inherently better.
The difference is that cultures define “respect” differently.
Some cultures believe:
directness equals honesty.
Others believe:
indirectness equals respect.
Information Flow in Different Cultures
Another important factor is information flow.
Some cultures tend to prefer:
hierarchy-driven communication
top-down structures
Others are more comfortable with:
open discussion
decentralized communication
For example:
In some Asian workplace cultures, publicly challenging senior leadership may be considered inappropriate.
But in many American startup environments, challenging ideas is often interpreted as engagement and critical thinking.
Different Cultures View Time Differently
Another interesting cultural difference involves time.
For example:
U.S. / Germany
These cultures are often:
punctual
schedule-oriented
efficiency-driven
Latin American / Middle Eastern cultures
These environments may place greater emphasis on:
relationships
flexibility
situational adjustment
As a result, the same behavior may be interpreted very differently depending on the culture.
The Most Important Skill in Cross-Cultural Leadership: Adaptability
Many people think global leadership is mostly about speaking English well.
But in reality, one of the most important qualities is: adaptability
Because cross-cultural leadership is not about making others become more like you.
It is about understanding how different people see the world.
Mature Cross-Cultural Communication
Mature cross-cultural communication is not based on:
stereotypes
assumptions
forcing others into your own cultural framework
Instead, it requires:
observation
curiosity
empathy
Before judging another culture, the more important step is usually:
learning to understand it first.
Cross-Cultural Communication and Career Development
Over the years, working in biotech and career consulting has made me realize that cross-cultural communication is deeply connected to career growth.
Today, many leadership roles require:
global teamwork
international collaboration
cross-functional communication
Many highly capable people do not struggle because of lack of technical skill.
They struggle because they cannot effectively navigate different communication styles across cultures.
What I Have Observed Through LuTra Studio
Through career consulting at LuTra Studio, I often see Asian professionals face challenges in American workplace environments, such as:
hesitating to express themselves confidently
being overly indirect in feedback
discomfort with self-promotion
interview narratives that feel too reserved
However, in many U.S. workplace cultures:
clarity
confidence
direct communication
are highly valued.
As a result, career development is often not just technical preparation.
It is also a process of cultural adaptation.
Conclusion: Global Leadership Begins with Understanding Different People
Today’s workplace is increasingly global.
And leadership is no longer about managing people with identical backgrounds.
Strong leaders must learn how to:
build trust across cultures
create alignment between different ways of thinking
collaborate across differences
Because in many situations, the hardest part is not language.
It is understanding how different people interpret the world.





Comments